"Whether the U.S. functionally created ISIS or merely inspired it, its popularity was a foregone conclusion. You cannot blow people up with impunity, even if you’re as “exceptional” as Obama proclaims the U.S. to be; there will be blowback…"
Blowback has arrived in the form of the beheading of several journalists by a group called ISIS. Popular opinion in the United States is overwhelmingly in favor of military strikes against the persons perpetrating these acts, 88% in a survey cited in today’s press. The idea that we can locate and strike those individuals with drones is preposterous, but reason is not a part of the discussion. There is no discussion at all…"

Blowback by RAZFX

Yes, I agree that the two things (Drone strikes and beheadings) are not the same. The execution of someone we assume innocent of any wrongful acts, using a knife and in person, is quite different from the execution of total strangers, by remote control, from thousands of miles away, using advanced technology which has, and is meant to have, extraordinary violent properties.

People who have been victims of drone attacks and family members of some killed with the missiles fired from drones have testified before Congressional committees with only a handful of legislators in attendance. Presumably, the 429 members of the House had better things to do. There was no Senator George McGovern to remind them that “the walls of this Chamber reek with blood.”

Victims explain that the drones can be heard hovering, sometimes for long periods, before they fire their missiles. Those on the ground can sometimes take shelter where they can but nothing is of much use under that assault. People in the fields, tending crops, playing with grandchildren….
Also see The War Nerd: The long, twisted history of beheadings as propaganda
It must have been damned annoying, being an IS fighter, bouncing over the plains in your Toyota Hilux, as the terrified Iraqi Army forces vanished ahead of you in a cloud of panicky dust. Quite a rush for the mix of AQI survivors and European-Muslim war tourists who fill IS’s ranks.

And then all of a sudden, you go from the dashing light-armor knights of the Iraqi plain to the biggest, most vulnerable targets imaginable—thin-skinned vehicles crawling over a completely flat, treeless plain while the drones buzz overhead, armed with Hellfire missiles, just waiting for authorization from a desk jockey in suburban Virginia before they release a weapon designed to destroy much bigger, tougher, Soviet tanks. Suddenly, you, with your Sunni Lawrence of Arabia war-tourist dreams, are nothing but a bug getting zapped by an automated pest-control device.

It’s insulting. And the kind of young men who join IS are romantics, of a sort. They might not mind dying in the abstract—most guys don’t, at that age, until they find out what it feels like to get shot in the stomach—but they hate the idea of dying in such an unchivalrous way.

So, they take their revenge the best way they can: With a video camera, a hostage, and a short, sharp knife. Why a short knife, by the way? Why not use an ax, if you’re going to behead someone? Because with a short knife, you have to saw the head off slowly. It’s how you kill a sheep. It’s degrading to the victim.

Beheading, done with a sharp, heavy ax or sword, was traditionally an aristocratic death in Europe; when Dr. Louis invented the guillotine, he was extending human dignity, as he saw it, by making a noble and quick death by decapitation available to the masses—a huge improvement on hanging, which was usually the “yank on a rope til he stops moving” kind, not the advanced calculation of the Victorian hangman you see in movies. The Parisians loved the new machine; they had a sweet little name for death by guillotine: “Putting your head on the windowsill.” And it was that easy—lay your head down and off it rolled!

But decapitation by knife is a very different matter…

"The enemy of your enemy is your other weapons customer.".
I know you mean well. I know you think you’ve found a bargain that nobody else noticed hidden in a back corner of the used car lot. Let me warn you: it’s a clunker. Here, I’ll list the defects. You can have your own mechanic check them out:

1. If you want to bomb a country every time an evil group murders people in a gruesome manner, you’ll have to bomb a lot of countries including our own.  ISIS draws its strength in Iraq from resentment of the Iraqi government, which beheads people, albeit in grainier footage with lower production values.  Allies in the region, including allies that support ISIS, including allies armed by the United States (some of which arms end up in the hands of ISIS), themselves behead people regularly. But is that worse than other types of killing? When President Barack Obama blew up a 16 year old American boy whom nobody had ever accused of so much as jaywalking, and blew up six other kids who were too close to him at the time, do you imagine his head remained on his body?

As with most drone strikes, that boy could have been arrested and questioned. Had he been, though, gruesome death would have remained a possibility. In April, the United States injected a man with chemicals that made him writhe in excruciating pain for 43 minutes and die. Last week in the United States a man facing a similar fate on death row was proven innocent and freed. The prosecutor who had put him there 30 years earlier showed zero remorse. Now I’m not proposing that we bomb North Carolina because I’m angry at that prosecutor…

In Full, David Swanson @Washington’s Blog, “Warning to War Supporters


Meanwhile, In The Skies Above ISIS, “a triggerhappy remote-control operator in Whiteman Air Force Base is about to get jiggy with some jihadists…”

(Source: zerohedge.com)

"By exercising policy "regardless of borders," the US has just hung itself politically in its efforts to protect the newly installed regime in Kiev, Ukraine, and prevent Russia from intervening against what are literally battalions of Neo-Nazi militants operating along Russia’s border with Ukraine. Citing the need to "protect the Russian people" resonates clearer in regards to legitimate concerns, considering Ukraine’s proximity to Russian territory, than America’s claims that a region on the other side of the planet, where one of its citizens voluntarily chose to put himself into harms way by covering an ongoing armed conflict, somehow now requires direct US military intervention.

August 28, 2014 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - The US has claimed it will begin reconnaissance flights over Syria - a tentative first step toward direct military intervention it has sought in attempts to overthrow the Syrian government since 2011. While the US is using the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq (ISIS) as a pretext to carry out these intrusions into Syrian territory, it was the US itself that created and to this day perpetuates ISIS and other extremist militant fronts amid a documented attempt to reorder the entire Middle East.

What is expected to follow is an incremental expansion of US military intervention in eastern Syria that will include further arming and funding of the very terrorist networks it claims it is violating Syria’s borders to attack, culminating in eventual military operations carried out against the Syria government itself.

The US’ justification for directly intervening in Syria however, only further undermines the very “international norms” it claims to champion, and opens the door for other nations it is menacing to use more direct means to confront its agenda of global military aggression, including along Russia’s border with Ukraine.

— "America’s Creeping Into Syria Will Hang Itself in Ukraine" ::: More at Land Destroyer


Footage from the New York Times seems to verify my assumption. The Israelis just used a US$1-6 million dollar Patriot missile to shoot down a rather large model airplane (variant of the Iranian Ababil-1… shorter than a Volkswagen Bug and capable of carrying a 45 kg [88 lb] payload) euphemistically referred to as a ‘drone’.

Not JUST Disproportionate Response, Disproportionate Cost of War:
"#Israel downs unmanned #Gaza drone" with Patriot missile (Unit cost US$1 to 6 million) (per wikipedia) (USAToday)

Sounds like ##Hamas #Gaza Drones over #Israel = RC model airplanes stuffed w explosives v Patriot missile US$1-6 mil (Middle East Monitor)

blog comments powered by Disqus